Tag Archives: crisis

The Beginning of the End?

Euro ‘increasing unemployment and social hardship’, says EC

Deepening economic divisions between North and South,
rich and poor eurozone countries threaten to undermine
the European Union itself, report states

So, an actual EC report tells us the bleedin’ obvious. Is this honesty, or as anyone with more than one brain cell will know, just another brick in the construction of a European Superstate?

Concerning this, it seems to me that the basic question is now this:

Will Germany agree to eurobonds to save the euro?

If it does (and Merkel has so far more or less said “Over My Dead Body”) then debt is equally shared and effectively backed by Germany, which would see much-increased inflation and a sharp fall in living standards. And of course, this being effectively financial union, it would inevitably lead to political union or the same in all but name.

If it doesn’t, the euro cannot survive; eventually, Italy, or even France will crack – its people rebel against the Brusselian-German Diktat. As all economists predicted, the euro simply cannot work for such disparate economies. But all the eurozealots KNEW this. The problems in the euro are ALL part of a DELIBERATE STRATEGY to force political union.

This ranks in my book as a crime: the deliberate deception of hundreds of millions of people, who were never told the truth or warned of the risks. And of course, even when they voted AGAINST the Lisbon Treaty (France and Ireland) the decision was effectively taken out of the people’s hands, their being of course too stupid to make the right decision.

It is staggering that the people responsible are ready to blame anyone but themselves for this disaster: the banks, the ratings agencies, the Anglo-Saxons ….. but NONE of them will be punished for this crime.

The Eurocon revealed:

Leave a comment

Posted by on January 22, 2014 in European Union, Politics


Tags: , ,


The IMF is pontificating again. Apparently debt is now so bad that governments are going to have to develop sophisticated “instruments” to – in effect – inflate away, confiscate and/or force us to spend our money. (See Cyprus – “haircut” history)

“The (IMF) paper says the Western debt burden is now so big that rich states will need same tonic of debt haircuts, higher inflation and financial repression – defined as an “opaque tax on savers” – as used in countless IMF rescues for emerging markets.”

I like the reference to “rich countries”. Can a country which is vastly indebted still be considered as “rich”? Am I supposed to consider as rich my mate down the road who has vast debt and yet STILL continually spends way more than his income just because his house is stuffed full with electronic gadgets and he somehow manages to run a posh car?

In layman’s terms, this all seems to amount to a “savings tax” – the confiscation of money legally and frugally acquired but not spent. Please correct me if I am wrong. This must surely be the ultimate in Big Brother lunacy. We ALREADY pay LOTS of tax on what we earn and then we are to be taxed again if we choose to be frugal and careful and save some of what’s left. This really IS in the category of “You could not make it up.” What’s next; a 100% tax and the government spending it FOR us?

And all this financial chaos is NOT OUR FAULT; government over-spending is to blame. The PLEBS did not rack up this insane debt; GOVERNMENTS did. The concept of “living within one’s means” just does not seem to enter into it.

None of these people that we elect have the guts to say to their people: “Sorry, we can’t afford that.” Instead, they spend vast sums they do not have to effectively BRIBE voters with their own money to vote for them. I say “their own money”, but most of it is of course BORROWED.

Yup, the current situation is caused by GOVERNMENTS: people we ELECT and PAY to LEAD US. But I did not ask Gordon Brown to rack up vast debt; I did not ask the Coalition to CONTINUE to INCREASE debt. I elected them to do what is necessary to reduce it, because – bleedin’ obviously – too much debt is very BAD. I know that; all my mates down the pub know that; my 90-year-old Gran knows that, but Europe’s  politicians apparently do NOT.  Or if they do, they do not CARE. In extreme cases, having got their own countries into extreme debt (France) they want some OTHER country (Germany) to bail them out.

I have a theory that Homo Sapiens is basically unhinged when it comes to collective actions affecting the long-term. Can someone convince me it’s not true?

However, it is important to try to read between the lines. All this twaddle (beautifully wrapped up in posh economists’ psychobabble) is from the IMF, an organisation run by French political-crony Christine Lagarde. Having totally failed as French Finance Minister to put a brake on her own country’s lunatic spending she was put in charge of the IMF to tell other people how it should be done.  You might think this to be worth yet ANOTHER “You could not make it up” award. And of course, her secret agenda is to find a way to bail out France so it can continue with its “French model” of high state spending, taxes and general interference and insane regulation. That’s what this is about ……

So, I have seen through your little game, Ms Lagarde ….. and stealing our savings will NOT help you to the French Presidency …… your plebs are going to have something to say about that. Please do something useful: retire and go and plant potatoes and trees: the former to feed us and the latter to save us from Global Warming.

OH, some of the debt crisis might be eased if you would pay tax on your OWN vast salary ……..


Tags: , , , , ,

More on Banks, Investment & China

Blogger A): “Anyone who insures Chinese debt now is a frickin moron.”

Blogger B): “…which means all the major banks are morons because they all trade CDS like they were hotcakes..we are going to get whacked again by these dangerous loonies who learnt nowt from 2008.”

C) ME!: They may not be morons, since they must KNOW what is going on, but the point is that they DON’T CARE. A) They are making lots of money NOW and B) if it all goes pear-shaped most are “too big to fail” and C) they will pass on any costs to customers anyway.

Unfotunately, there was no cleaning of the Augean banking stables so filthy that Hercules (was it he – I often get my Gods mixed up?) would have had a fit if asked to clean them up.

“… these dangerous loonies who learnt nowt from 2008”.

By “loonies” I take it you are referring to the banks, but I would prefer your statement to be linked to GOVERNMENTS. After all,  governments are supposed to govern for the PEOPLE – not the banks.

The bottom line is that five years after the biggest crisis since the Great Depression NOTHING substantial of long-term effectiveness seems to have been done and we seem to be facing another crisis in the near future.

I personally have concluded that banks are too much like WOMDs to be private, even though public ownership is usually incompetent.

Leave a comment

Posted by on December 14, 2013 in Business & the Economy, Politics


Tags: , , , ,

“The Eurosoap for Dummies”

I hope the following will clarify the succession of bizarre events taking place in Europe as the euro fights against all reason for its existence.

The whole of Europe is in an economic and financial shambles for several reasons.

BACKGROUND: The original founders of the first European “union”, principally Jean Monnet, Robert Schuman, Konrad Adenauer, Charles de Gaulle et al, were convinced that only the creation of a European superstate would put an end to endless European wars for all time. Leaving aside the fact that they seem never to have read about the multiple civil wars arising because people(s) with different cultures, ideas and principles were forced together, this was a project never overtly explained to the Europeans. The idea was to achieve this by stealth through a number of small but incremental and irreversible steps. This is all outlined very clearly on the following site:

The people of Europe were to be led like lambs to this superstatehood; as little direct choice as possible was to be offered to them. Thus the British voted purely on a “Common Market”, but since then the EU has turned into something completely and utterly different, to the point where much of Britain’s sovereignty has been abandoned. The Brusselomafia (for the above-mentioned reasons – the Europeans being too dim to know what is good for them) hate referendums, and do their best to avoid them. In those few cases where they have unavoidably taken place with negative results the people concerned have had to vote again until they got it right. The most blatant case of Euro-fascism was when the EU, France and Germany teamed up to force the democratically-elected PM of Greece out of office for daring to propose a referendum on the euro to his people.

The Eurozealots clearly believe in the rightness of their mission, which as usual has led them to putting the ends above the means. Nobody faults their good intentions per se, only their judgement and lack of faith in – and one could say contempt of – the people.

1) …. was a political construct based on the above-outlined principles and specifically (the ends justifying the means) on a combination of lies and complete denial of economic reality and indeed commonsense. The project’s instigators were told by their own economists that it could not work without full financial/economic and thus political union. Not one single European voter has ever voted for the latter, but that is a fact of supreme irrelevance to the zealots who launched it. Their entire project is as explained above based on introducing a USE by stealth against the wishes of the people of Europe. The particular step of the euro was no doubt considered by Eurozealots as “a great leap forward”, but in pushing it so hard they may have shot themselves severely in the foot and delayed their master project for many years.

2) Once the euro was in place most participants – and in Southern Europe in particular – threw themselves into a frenzy of spending and borrowing, aided and abetted by grasping, greedy and stupid banks who have vastly over-extended themselves. The vast over-borrowing was accompanied in many cases by almost blatant corruption allied to idiocy, with Spain getting the funds to build twice as many airports as Germany and Portugal getting infrastructure payments for motorways on which hardly anyone travels.

Efforts to prop up the moribund eurodinosaur have been inspired not only by the zealots’ lunatic and totally unmandated dream of a United States of Europe but also by desperate efforts to save ludicrously-overextended French and German banks from collapse if the euro broke up.

3) European leaders (there’s a funny idea) have MASSIVELY overborrowed and overspent to the point where economic collapse and default threaten almost everyone except Germany.

The whole eurosaga is absolutely fascinating from any number of viewpoints, not least the psychological one. From the increasingly desperate and hysterically-convoluted machinations we have witnessed over the past few years it is fascinating to see the following desperate searches by our leaders:

  • … for some sort of magic solution which will fix the problems without pain, and especially without their losing their grip on power.
  • …. for someone else to blame for it all.

Concerning culprits, there have been a succession of usual suspect candidates rotating in popularity, including: the ratings agencies, the banks, the Anglo-Saxons in general, the USA, mortgage traders, hedge funds, China, the Greeks, Spanish and Portuguese, capitalism itself, the Fed and the ECB.

The funny thing is, I have yet to hear of any of the people actually responsible for this farrago of lies and incompetence accepting any of the blame themselves. It is also important top note that the PEOPLE of Europe have had NO SAY in all this and are ENTIRELY INNOCENT of the damage caused by the euro. On the other hand, these people did elect cretinous governments, and so must take indirect blame. Indeed, the people of Greece even RE-ELECTED the same tired, old, venal and incompetent politicians responsible for Greece’s plight in the first place. One might conclude that the people of Europe are indeed stupid, but only insofar as they trusted the traditional parties that went along with the eurodisaster.

But the hysterical thing is that now Germany herself has joined the other usual suspects, and why? Because it is exporting too much!

A quadroika of unlikely bedfellows – Christine Lagarde, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the US government and the EU Commission – have all called at one time or another (and the latter two most recently) for Germany to reduce its exports. The EU is even gearing up for a potentially catastrophic legal spat with Germany, without whom the entire EU could collapse if German public opinion is wound up and insulted too much. They already have to put up with calls of NAZIS and their Chancellor caricatured with a Hitler moustache in Greece, a country to which they have given BILLIONS.

“The European Commission has warned Germany it could face disciplinary action for running excess trade surpluses at the expense of EU partners, joining the US Treasury in criticising Berlin for doing too little to help lift Europe out of its slump.”

Now, I am not an economist (to be honest, economists have not enjoyed the best of images in recent years and secondly why should we leave all discussion of the economies of the world to them?) but here goes ……

On the face of it, this demand of Germany to cut its exports is surreally ludicrous.

A) When Mercedes gets an order for n number of cars from China, what is it supposed to do? “Sorry Mr Zheng – we have sold our quota already and cannot sell you any more.” How are Mercedes workers and shareholders supposed to react to that? Will it be allowed to sell the Mercs to France to resell on to China?

B) It is only Germany that is preventing a total collapse of the entire European economy. Only Germany retains true credibility, thanks mostly to its export success. Only Germany has helped to maintain the value of the euro, without which oil and food imports would have rocketed. Yes, a high euro is bad for exports, but according to the EU, exports are bad anyway. And in any case if Italy and the rest of the Club Med would like a LOWER-valued currency to boost their exports, then they can exit the euro which was NEVER going to be able to accommodate them all in the same currency as Germany. Remember, they were TOLD this and IGNORED it. So, as ye reap so shall ye sew.

Sadly, it is Human Nature to want your cake AND eat it, but Greece et al CANNOT both be in a currency union with Germany AND retain control of the exchange rate of that currency. This was ALWAYS CLEAR but – as I said – arrogantly and stupidly ignored by the people responsible.

C) Germany at the time had no particular desire to give up its precious Deutschmark, but was dragged into it by the demands of France and others, using – as ever – residual German WWI & II guilt as moral blackmail. To prove themselves “good Europeans” the Germans went along with it, especially as they were promised there would be strict rules and they would never have to bail out the rest.

As for the “strict rules”, Greece for a start was allowed into the eurozone despite blatant falsification with the help of Goldman-Sachs of its financial data in order to meet these “strict rules”.

Once the doomed currency started, Eurozone members were supposed to keep strictly to a borrowing maximum of 3% GDP, yet almost all countries rapidly exceeded this during the early days as growth was slow and spending had to be kept up to avoid having to take difficult decisions with their own voters. None of these national leaders had the courage to tell their voters that the country was living beyond its means and there would have to be cut-backs. Much easier of course to borrow more to fuel “growth”. France is a special case: when challenged about its breach of the limit, a French spokesperson said: “That rule was designed for little countries, not those like France.”

So, returning to our sheep, Germany is now supposed to increase wages, stoke up inflation and reduce exports in order to stimulate the French economy. In other words, it is the Germans’ fault ……

…. which is of course hysterically idiotic and stupefyingly hypocritical:

  • The French have not set a balanced budget since NINETEEN SEVENTY-FOUR. In other words, they have been living beyond their means for nearly FORTY YEARS.
  • They have just about the highest proportion in the EU of GDP spent in the public sector.
  • To sustain this vast state edifice they are by some measures the highest-taxed country IN THE WORLD.
  • They have extremely high costs imposed on employers for employing people and highly-restrictive employment regulations running to over THREE THOUSAND PAGES compared to the 70 of neighbours Switzerland, hardly a failing country.
  • Since the socialists came to power last year the French government has imposed or raised over EIGHTY-THREE taxes, many totally new.

The French social fabric is cracking. Only last week the government – as usual – backed down when faced with demonstrations in Brittany. Even EU Vice-President Ollie Rehn said “The French cannot take any more taxes.”

Despite all this, the Germans are supposed to reduce THEIR taxes to increase German inflation and cut exports even as the French massively increase theirs. The Germans are thus to be punished for holding their own wages low, improving productivity and competitiveness and being highly productive in making things the world wants. In effect, the EU and France want Germany to be pulled down to the level of all the rest in the name of “solidarity”. It is apparently not fair that Germany is doing well; clearly, the fact that France is a basket-case is the fault of German exports. (you could not make it up.)

Here are a couple of extracts summarizing this particular soap-opera, with the French Fairy Princess on the one hand and the Wicked German Witch on the other:

March 17, 2010: “French Finance Minister Christine Lagarde sparked a bitter row with an interview published in the Financial Times Monday in which she called on Germany to curb its export surplus. She reiterated her position Wednesday in remarks to the French radio station RTL, when she said that Germany could reduce taxes to boost domestic demand — which would free up more money to buy French products. “An improvement in domestic consumption could help our exports to Germany, our most important trading partner,” Lagarde said.”

The German riposte was swift and decisive:

“Earlier on Wednesday, deputy government spokesman Christoph Steegmans had said that it was not possible to tell export-oriented companies to produce less attractive goods. He stressed that Germany currently had strong and innovative small and medium-sized companies – the famous Mittelstand that is behind much of the country’s export success.

The Federation of German Wholesale and Foreign Trade (BGA) was outraged by the criticism from France, saying in a statement that Germany could not deliberately restrain its exports to give less competitive countries a chance. Instead, the association argued, countries with low levels of exports should consider whether they need to improve their own competitiveness.

Germany’s new European commissioner, Guenther Oettinger, went as far as to recommend that other countries follow the German model. “In Europe, we need more reforms like the ones which have been carried out in Germany,” Oettinger said.”

To fill out the background a bit, this is the same IMF President Christine Lagarde who:

  • ….. as French Finance Minister under Sarkozy did absolutely nothing to rein in France’s horrendous over-spending.
  • ….. lambasted the Greeks for not paying taxes while she herself pays none at all. That takes a certain chutzpah, which I believe is the appropriate word.

To sum up, the Germans want everyone to be like them while everyone else wants to stay as they are with the Germans paying for it. This is not an easy proposition to sell to the German people. The EU on the other hand wants everyone to be the same within one gigantic super-state, and this is not an easy proposition to sell to ANYone, especially the British. The French keep schtumm on the subject, but I for one can never imagine them giving up their sovereignty. What they really want is for the Germans to stop being unfair by exporting so much and to get their hands on more German money without any accompanying German political control. It is as if in a football international they were asking the Germans to play with no goalkeeper because the rest of their team is too good. If Hollande thinks he can sell that to Merkel, then “Bonne Chance Monsieur.”

Meanwhile, the British look upon all this with a mixture of disbelief and horror, and the following is not designed to impress them much either:

THE EU & OUR MONEY – YOU COULD NOT MAKE IT UP: “The European Union wasted almost £6 billion last year – including £800 million from British taxpayers – on fraudulent, illegal or ineligible spending projects, official auditors have found.”

SIX BILLION??? We are so used to billions being tossed around (They do the same with trillions in the US apparently) that we have lost sight of just what a staggering sum this is. On the basis of a euro coin being 2.33mm thick, if you stacked this up in one-euro coins it would reach nearly FOURTEEN THOUSAND KILOMETRES into the sky. I am not very good at maths so I may have got a zero or two to many, but in any case it is a staggering sum to “lose”.


  1. The euro was a practical nonsense from the beginning and is doomed. Greece, Portugal et al will never be able to live in the same currency union as GermanyUNLESS ……
  2. The Germans accept full debt mutualisation, higher inflation and MASSIVE transfers of wealth over decades to the non-performing European countries.
  3. Merkel has said debt mutualisation will only occur over her dead body (or words to that effect), so it comes down to how far you trust her. She seems to have a stark choice. Unfortunately, whatever the Germans do they will be ferociously blamed for it – by the rest of Europe if they refuse to cough up and by their own people if they do. Is collective German war guilt really so strong that it will lead Germany’s government to shaft its own people? All those guilty for WWI & WWI are DEAD after all.

So far, the Germans have been docile sheep being led to their slaughter. However, I am quite fearful of what might happen here should the German government bow to the demands of the eurozealots and agree to full financial and political union (the two are inseparable – and of course nonsensical).

Don’t miss next week’s episode of “The Eurosoap”!

PS I just checked once again the EU site about its own history, and found this:

“The following visionary leaders inspired the creation of the European Union we live in today. Without their energy and motivation we would not be living in the sphere of peace and stability that we take for granted.” (

It is of course nauseating and stupid. Peace in Europe was won and maintained by the Allied forces fighting Hitler and later deterring the Russians from aggression. There is no reason whatsoever to give the credit for post WWII peace in Europe to the EU. It is the often reviled Anglo-Saxons and later NATO that Europe principally has to thank, but NATO never figures in any of the credits apportioned by the EU. Ironically, the EU’s lunatic project has brought conflict closer in impoverishing large areas of Europe, which is exactly what happened in the 30s and led to Hitler.

For this reason, the award of the Nobel Peace Prize to the EU was as moronic as it was to Barack Obama, who as far as I can see got it for being black.

It is all a farrago of denial and lies, which is a shame. Many people believe like me passionately in “Europe”. After all, we live here. I am British, married to a German, have three Anglo-Spanish daughters and a tri-lingual son, have worked and lived in three European countries, and my wife and I both speak four European languages fluently.  Yet the EU Brusselomafia has turned me completely against the EU. I cannot work with lies, denial and delusions.



Leave a comment

Posted by on November 12, 2013 in European Union


Tags: , , , ,

Van Rompo Pontificates again ….

Van Rompo is on great form at the moment:

Proposals for a peace conference in Geneva were “the best and the only possible chance we have to halt this conflict for which there is no military solution”, said Mr Van Rompuy.

Idiot – there certainly IS a “military solution”. This involves Assad, the mass-murdering family-dynasty gangster despot, defeating a popular uprising using total air supremacy plus thousands of foreign troops from Iran and Lebanon allied with thousands of tons of modern weapons supplied by Russia and Iran and thereby slaughtering tens of thousands of “rats” and rebels.

I would dearly love to see van Rompo take on Assad’s Russian tanks and planes with a Kalashnikov and a few rpgs

B) “There is no comparison between the situation today and the situation nine months ago, when the euro was under existential threat. That is not the case any more.”

Idiot – there certainly IS a comparison between the millions of young people unemployed then and also NOW. The underlying problems of the euro have not disappeared; A single currency does not fit all the disparate economies of Europe. The idea that this shambles is a necessary – and ultimately successful – part of bringing  the Club Med up to German speed is staggeringly stupid. ALL reputable economists SAID the euro could not work with such a disparate group of countries and the EU IGNORED them, including their OWN economists – quite apart from everyone conniving in the gigantic LIES from Greece about its entry qualification to the euro in the first place. Nothing in these basic principles has changed. Italy is losing its major industries as the euro is too strong and they cannot compete with Germany. France is in VERY BIG trouble – the dinosaur in the middle. Van Rompuy is – as I said – an idiot. He should get out of his 300,000 million euro ivory tower palace and meet the young people of Southern Europe. HIS position is secure, but not the future of millions of European citizens betrayed by USE zealots like him. Has HE ever done a proper day’s work in his life?

And it is surreally laughable how these people clutch at straws. Getting all the avoided & evaded tax and this EU/USE trade deal are now supposed to be the twin Dei ex Machina that will bring back prosperity. What an absolute tosser.

Not the only one, of course. Ken “Never-got-it-right-yet” Clarke has also been banging on about the UK being “left out of international deals” – OH DEAR! Poor little landlocked Switzerland!! Shall we have a whip-round for them? I suppose for pratts like Clarke and Clegg 50 MILLION quid per DAY is a small price to pay for the chance of having a ludicrously-overpaid sinecure with little tax and VAST benefits in Brussels.

Being a part of the single market is a financial disaster for all involved, the EU commission’s own figures prove this. In 2003 the EU commission revealed that the single market caused a net loss of €435 billion to participant economies.

“The Single Market’s regulations do not come cheap. Günter Verheugen, EU commissioner for enterprise and industry, recently announced that EU regulations were costing the European economy some €600bn a year (this was almost twice as high as previous estimates). €600bn is some 5.5pc of total EU GDP, equivalent to the size of the Dutch economy.Comparing the Single Market’s costs with its benefits makes for painful reading. In 2003 the Commission published its assessment that EU GDP in 2002 was around €165bn higher than it would have been without the Single Market. Even after allowing for the extra GDP growth since 2002, this means that the benefits are less than a third of the costs.”

Have a good day, and wave goodbye to another 53 million quid …….

Leave a comment

Posted by on June 18, 2013 in European Union


Tags: , , ,

Crisis? What crisis?

Why don’t politicians tell the truth?

You can blame Osborne if you like, but the British public also has to take some blame. They didn’t protest while Brown was pursuing his moronic borrow and spend binge and at the slightest sign of “austerity” they whinge even more.

“Cuts”? The “cuts” are insignificant compared to what is really needed. VAST sums have to be cut from benefits and indeed from most other areas: quangoes, advisors, consultants, H&SE, the EU and so on.

Otherwise we are finished. Why are politicians unwilling to do this? Because the public A) understands nothing about national economics (despite knowing you can’t endlessly spend more than your income) and B) expects a magic solution and therefore C) Any government doing what is really necessary (which is going to be VERY painful) will be politically punished, and in the UK’s case involve handing back power to the very same party that caused the problem in the first place.

The British (and above all Scottish Labour Party voting fodder) public will vote Labour in at the next election in the hope of the latter, and things will get WORSE.

It is not looking good, but it will be even worse elsewhere, in France for a start.

 The bizarre thing about about this crisis is the endless stream of ministers and unelected morons in Brussels claiming the crisis is over or improving whereas MUCH worse is yet to come.

Leave a comment

Posted by on March 22, 2013 in Britain, European Union


Tags: , , ,

The Queen’s Question

“Why did nobody see it coming?”

Many DID see it coming, especially those involved in it.

So your question, M’am, is indeed naive.

“Why didn’t anyone do anything to prevent it?” would be a better question, to which the answer is:

– Those creating the problem were doing too well out of it to give a toss.

– The THREE THOUSAND people working for the FSA are presumably idiots – one has to ask what their point was – or is. Or did one or two raise doubts and then get told to keep their gobs shut?

– Gordon Brown studied history at university and had not a clue about management, finance, economics or indeed much else.

– His fawning acolytes, including the fairly odious Balls, did nothing either during thirteen years of binge, boom and humungous bust. This total failure  was a combination of not daring to stick their head over the parapet, being cowards (the same thing) and incompetence.

I have my own question: “What % of the truly guilty have been punished in any way?”

To which the answer is – at a guess (and probably vastly inflated) – 4%.



Tags: , , ,