Monthly Archives: October 2013

Snowden & Cuba

Here is a question put to me recently by a Cuban sympathizer:

“Most intelligent and educated Americans are embarrassed and appalled by Snowden’s revelations.”

My answer:

How the hell do YOU know what “most intelligent and educated Americans think?”

As an expert on the Cuban paradise, have you any statistics on the number of:

  • people imprisoned for attempting the art of free speech in Cuba?

  • people who died trying to escape from the island?

  • well-off, multi-propertied, internet-using, middle-class, psychotically-anti-American hypocrites like yourself who have fled to Cuba to escape the evils of capitalism?

As for surveillance, the following is – or should be – bleedin’ obvious:

  • Countries need intelligence to thwart possible attacks on them and their innocent civilians.

  • ALL countries have intelligence services which do what the Yanks do, only usually not as well.

  • ALL countries have counter-intelligence services, and if they didn’t know their citizens were being spied on they must be crap at their job.

  • Such intelligence-gathering by its very nature must be widely-trawled – how the hell do you spy ONLY on culprits?

  • US intelligence-gathering has undoubtedly saved innocent lives and enabled them to kill extremely nasty people as typified by those who blew up a bus in Afghanistan carrying women and kids to a wedding.

  • ANYTHING can be “abused” (and usually is by someone), depending how you define the word –  name me a SINGLE government that has never “abused” its powers.

  • People will die as a result of Snowden’s revelations.

  • Most US citizens will probably curse him as a traitor who should be shot. However, until a proper count is done such statements are fairly meaningless. Had you had relatives in the Twin Towers then you might feel differently.

  • US haters might care to remember that the country twice saved Europe from fascism and in the second case established peaceful democracies from Japan to France.

The USA is a free country, albeit with many problems and injustices. Even so, many more want to enter it than leave it, which seems to be the opposite to Cuba. Does this not give you cause for thought?

The sad thing about Cuba is that it had a chance to find a path to a form of democracy that could be admired – avoiding the worst excesses of the USA in terms of inequality – but has blown it. Instead we have the same, tired old family dynasty of an ossified state that we see everywhere else where dictatorship takes over. 

You are supposed to believe what you are told – not have your own opinion – and the state is always right. What used to be forbidden and evil (the chance to run your own small business and make a profit) has suddenly become PC, but is there any apology from the regime for 50 years of insane stagnation?

Incidentally, how is the relationship between those great allies Cuba and North Korea going? You might care to read this disgusting account of someone who unbelievably escaped from a NK concentration camp. Of course, it is probably all CIA lies.

Leave a comment

Posted by on October 30, 2013 in Politics


British Labour Party hypocrisy


Left-wing grandees have a long track record of passionately supporting comprehensives – except when it comes to their own children.

“Harold Wilson and James Callaghan both sent their children to private schools, while Tony Blair plumped for the London Oratory, a high-performing faith school in Fulham that was grant-maintained at the time. Tony Crosland and Shirley Williams, the architects of Labour’s comprehensive schools policy, both went private, as did Polly Toynbee, who had the gall to attack me on Any Questions for wanting something better for my children than the nearest comprehensive. (You can listen to our exchange on the point here.  It kicks off at the 34m mark.) Diane Abbott sent her son to City of London Boys, while Harriet Harman sent one of her sons to a grammar school in Kent. The list goes on. And on. And on.”

AND – from the secret archives – just obtained by our mole in the NSA:

“Morning, Perkins.”

“Morning, Sir. Have you seen this in the DM?”

“Goodness, Perkins!! You know that only my wife reads that. What’s up now?”

“Well there’s this article on Labour hypocrisy. It’s devastating.”

“Come on Perkins – no exaggeration. The abolition of the BBC would be devastating, but a DM article slagging off Labour!!”

“But it highlights how they abolished grammar schools and yet sent all their own kids to them, or of course to private schools.”

“What’s hypocricital about that, Perkins?”

“Don’t you see, Sir? They said one thing and did another.”

“Technically, you may have a point, but you are missing one vital ingredient for true hypocrisy, Perkins.”

“I don’t see, Sir.”

“Well, the essence of hypocrisy is that you try to deceive people into thinking you are better than them, or at least are doing something noble with an element of self-sacrifice – like a Catholic priest abstaining from sex, for example, while at the same time operating a paedophilia ring which nobody is supposed to know about.”

“I’m still confused, Sir.”

“Look. Just answer this simple question. Does everyone know that all Labour utterances are riddled with lies of one kind or another? Yes, or No?”

“Well, ‘Yes’ – obviously, but ….”

“There you go. If everyone knows they lie as a matter of course then it can’t be true hypocrisy, can it? There is no attempt to deceive, since everyone knows it is all lies.”

“But why do they do it, Sir?”

“It’s all a game, Perkins. They pretend to tell the truth and their supporters pretend to believe them.”

“But that is appalling, Sir.”

“Indeed, Perkins.”

“Buy why, Sir?”

“Aha – there’s the rub. You see, Perkins, their supporters – those few who are not entirely brain-dead of course – always think that no matter how horrendously cynical, incompetent, sickening, venal, lying, Goebbesque, pretentious, crapulous and indeed treasonous their great party is, the alternative would be much worse. It’s all a question of the lesser of two evils, you see, and the Tories are – by definitition – ALWAYS the greater evil.”

“But it isn’t true, Sir!”

“Ah … dear old Perkins! Still a believer in ‘truth’. Sometimes you almost restore my faith in humanity …. The truth is unimportant; only what people believe to be the truth is important, and unfortunately, there are enough people who would not see the truth if it were rammed up them from behind.”

“Well, they certainly wouldn’t see it there, Sir!”

“Don’t be facetious, Perkins. You know what I mean. Come on – enough of this rumination – we have that government report on the enormous benefits of mass, uncontrolled immigration and the Islamicization of major cities to write.”

“But that’s all lies, too Sir!!

“Perkins. We are humble functionaries and must remember our station. If the government is going to lie, then at least it must make a good job of it, which is where we come in.”

“Of course, Sir.”

Leave a comment

Posted by on October 30, 2013 in Britain, Core Thought


Lettre à mon Député (encore)

Monsieur Urvoas

Alors, cela continue ……. rien que des impôts et l’attente désespéré de la croissance ……. Faisons le bilan ….

IMPÔTS: maintenant QUATRE-VINGT-SEPT taxes nouvelles ou augmentées depuis votre arrivée au pouvoir. Merci. “Croissance”? On n’a plus rien à dépenser.

La taxe sur l’épargne est imposée à 15,5% RETROSPECTIVEMENT à 1997. Magnifique, tout comme la taxe des plus valus sur sa maison principale et la période d’exonération doublée de 15 à 30 ans. MERCI.

L’élite politique de gauche souhaiterait imposer ENCORE des impôts, comme si le médicament principal des dernières décennies avait été correct mais insuffisante! SURRÉEL!

CRÉATION DE L’ARGENT: Vous détestez les entrepreneurs. Un exemple:

“J’ai créé une entreprise il y a sept ans. Si je le vends maintenant, je vais devoir payer au gouvernement 60% de la valeur que j’ai créée.”

Votre président a dit: “Je déteste les riches.” Expliquez-nous comment vous allez avoir une économie réussie sans créer des riches. Alors, tous ceux qui créent de l’argent seront punis? Magnifique.

LES ENTREPRISES: Complexité et coût ridicules pour lancer et pour fermer une entreprise, comme si ceux qui créent l’argent étaient des voyous. Complexité et coût ridicules pour embaucher ou virer des employés: 3,200 de pages dans le Code du Travail (70 en Suisse).

ÉCONOMIE: la part globale des exports de la France est tombée de 7% en 1999 à 3% aujourd’hui. Sa part des exports de l’UE est tombée de 17% à 12%. L’ Italie fait mieux maintenant. La dette ne cesse d’accroître.

L’OECD: “La France est sur-réglementée dans presque tous les domaines.” Exacte …

DÉSESPOIR: Ceux qui se sauvent vers l’étranger de cette folie (les plus ambitieux, les plus productifs, les jeunes – et Depardieu, évidemment) en 2012 = 40,000 – on prédit 60,000 pour 2013.

MÉDIAS: Vos médias “officiels”? Aucune objectivité – un tsunami d’information progouvernemental. On accuse ceux qui protestent contre cette folie d’être de “mauvais citoyens”.

PHILOSOPHIE: Vous restez dominés par “la gauche”, et une foi résiduelle dans le marxisme, un échec catastrophique partout au monde. Vous êtes détachés des réalités économiques: vous niez les évidences: vous enchaînez les entrepreneurs au lieu de les libérer.

VOTRE PRÉSIDENT n’a guère voyagé, ne parle aucune autre langue et n’a jamais travaillé dans un poste où il devait créer de l’argent. Il ne connaît ni comprend le secteur privé, le SEUL qui crée de l’argent que vous dépensez.

MENSONGES: Dans l’élection vous avez sauvagement critiqué Sarkozy pour vouloir imposer “l’austerité”, mais une fois élu, vous avez fait EXACTEMENT PAREIL, sinon PLUS.

LE FUTUR: Le FN ne peut que devenir plus populaire si vous ne changez pas radicalement – ce dont vous paraissez incapables. Mme Le Pen est – de toute évidence – beaucoup plus dangereuse que son père.

CONCLUSION: Vous n’êtes plus le parti “du peuple”, mais le parti d’une philosophie démodée et destructrice, du chômage, du gigantisme de l’état, de la réglementation, des impôts, du conservatisme (on ne change rien – exception faite de l’augmentation des impôts), des acquis (chauffeurs de taxi, notaires, pharmaciens, politiciens, chefs des universités, dirigeants de l’ENA etc). Vos prédecesseurs étaient pareils. Quand Mr Chirac est arrivé, il a promis des changements: L’ENA, les retraites etc, mais RIEN N’A ÉTÉ FAIT. Il n’y a JAMAIS de réelles restructurations intelligentes. L’état ne cesse de s’aggrandir.

  • réduisez la taille de l’état

  • réduisez les impots

  • abolissez le Code du Travail et faites comme la Suisse avec 70 pages au lieu de 3,200

  • abolissez les acquis

Je vous écris parce que j’aime la France, mais vous êtes en train de la ruiner.

Leave a comment

Posted by on October 29, 2013 in European Union, France


Tags: , , ,

Why Obama won the Election

Please take a moment to digest this provocative article by a Jewish Rabbi from Teaneck , N.J., Steven Pruzansky. It is far and away the most succinct and thoughtful explanation of how our nation is changing. The article appeared in “The Israel National News” in December 2012, and is directed to Jewish readership. 70% of American Jews vote as Democrats.

“The most charitable way of explaining the election results of 2012 is that Americans voted for the status quo – for the incumbent President and for a divided Congress. They must enjoy gridlock, partisanship, incompetence, economic stagnation and avoidance of responsibility. And fewer people voted.

But as we awake from the nightmare, it is important to eschew the facile explanations for the Romney defeat that will prevail among the chattering classes. Romney did not lose because of the effects of Hurricane Sandy that devastated this area, nor did he lose because he ran a poor campaign, nor did he lose because the Republicans could have chosen better candidates, nor did he lose because Obama benefited from a slight uptick in the economy due to the business cycle.

Romney lost because he didn’t get enough votes to win.That might seem obvious, but not for the obvious reasons. Romney lost because the conservative virtues – the traditional American virtues – of  liberty, hard work, free enterprise, private initiative and aspirations to moral greatness – no longer inspire or animate a majority of the electorate.

The simplest reason why Romney lost was because it is impossible to compete against free stuff. Every businessman knows this; that is why the “loss leader” or the giveaway is such a powerful marketing tool. Obama’s America is one in which free stuff is given away: the adults among the 47,000,000 on food stamps clearly recognized for whom they should vote, and so they did, by the tens of millions; those who – courtesy of Obama – receive two full years of unemployment benefits (which, of course, both disincentivizes looking for work and also motivates people to work off the books while collecting their windfall) surely know for whom to vote. The lure of free stuff is irresistible.

The defining moment of the whole campaign was the revelation of the secretly-recorded video in which Romney acknowledged the difficulty of winning an election in which “47% of the people” start off against him because they pay no taxes and just receive money – “free stuff” – from the government.

Almost half of the population has no skin in the game- they don’t care about high taxes, promoting business, or creating jobs, nor do they care that the money for their free stuff is being borrowed from their children and from the Chinese.

They just want the free stuff that comes their way at someone else’s expense. In the end, that 47% leaves very little margin for error for any Republican, and does not bode well for the future. It is impossible to imagine a conservative candidate winning against such overwhelming odds. People do vote their pocketbooks. In essence, the people vote for a Congress who will not raise their taxes, and for a President who will give them free stuff, never mind who has to pay for it.

That engenders the second reason why Romney lost: the inescapable conclusion that the electorate is ignorant and uninformed. Indeed,  it does not pay to be an informed voter, because most other voters – the clear majority – are unintelligent and easily swayed by emotion and raw populism.That is the indelicate way of saying that too many people vote with their hearts and not their heads. That is why Obama did not have to produce a second term agenda, or even defend his first-term record. He needed only to portray  Mitt Romney as a rapacious capitalist who throws elderly women over a cliff, when he is not just snatching away their cancer medication, while starving the poor and cutting taxes for the rich.

During his 1956 presidential campaign, a woman called out to Adlai Stevenson: “Senator, you have the vote of every thinking person!” Stevenson called back: “That’s not enough, madam, we need a majority!”

Truer words were never spoken.

Obama could get away with saying that “Romney wants the rich to play by a different set of rules” – without ever defining what those different rules were; with saying that the “rich should pay their fair share” – without ever defining what a “fair share” is; with saying that Romney wants the poor, elderly and sick to “fend for themselves” – without even acknowledging that all these government programs are going bankrupt, their current insolvency only papered over by deficit spending.

Similarly, Obama (or his surrogates) could hint to blacks that a Romney victory would lead them back into chains and proclaim to women that their abortions and birth control would be taken away. He could appeal to Hispanics that Romney would have them all arrested and shipped to Mexico and unabashedly state that he will not enforce the current immigration laws. He could espouse the furtherance of the incestuous relationship between governments and unions – in which politicians ply the unions with public money, in exchange for which the unions provide the politicians with votes, in exchange for which the politicians provide more money and the unions provide more votes, etc., even though the money is gone.

Obama also knows that the electorate has changed – that whites will soon be a minority in America(they’re already a minority in California) and that the new immigrants to the US are primarily from the Third World and do not share the traditional American values that attracted immigrants in the 19th and 20th centuries. It is a different world, and a different America . Obama is part of that different America , knows it, and knows how to tap into it. That is why he won.

Obama also proved again that negative advertising works, invective sells, and harsh personal attacks succeed. That Romney never engaged in such diatribes points to his essential goodness as a person; his  “negative ads” were simple facts, never personal abuse – facts about high unemployment, lower take-home pay, a loss of American power and prestige abroad, a lack of leadership, etc. As a politician, though, Romney failed   because he did not embrace the devil’s bargain of making unsustainable promises.

It turned out that it was not possible for Romney and Ryan – people of substance, depth and ideas – to compete with the shallow populism and platitudes of their opponents. Obama mastered the politics of envy – of class warfare – never reaching out to Americans as such but to individual groups, and cobbling together a winning majority from these minority groups. If an Obama could not be defeated – with his record and his vision of America, in which free stuff seduces voters – it is hard to envision any change in the future.

The road to Hillary Clinton in 2016 and to a European-socialist economy – those very economies that are collapsing today in Europe – is paved. For Jews, mostly assimilated anyway and staunch Democrats, the results demonstrate again that liberalism is their Torah. Almost 70% voted for a president widely perceived by Israelis and most committed Jews as hostile to Israel. They voted to secure Obama’s future at America’s expense and at Israel ‘s expense – in effect, preferring Obama to Netanyahu by a wide margin.

A dangerous time is ahead. Under present circumstances, it is inconceivable that the US will take any aggressive action against Iran and will more likely thwart any Israeli initiative. The US will preach the importance of negotiations up until the production of the first Iranian nuclear weapon – and then state that the world must learn to live with this new reality.

But this election should be a wake-up call to Jews. There is no permanent empire, nor is there an enduring haven for Jews anywhere in the exile. The American empire began to decline in 2007, and the deterioration has been exacerbated in the last five years. This election only hastens that decline.

Society is permeated with sloth, greed, envy and materialistic excess. It has lost its moorings and its moral foundations. The takers outnumber the givers, and that will only increase in years to come.

The “Occupy” riots across this country in the last two years were mere dress rehearsals for what lies ahead – years of unrest sparked by the increasing discontent of the unsuccessful who want to seize the fruits and the bounty of the successful, and do not appreciate the slow pace of redistribution.

If this election proves one thing, it is that the Old America is gone. And, sad for the world,
it is not coming back. The problems we face today are there because the people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living.”

Leave a comment

Posted by on October 23, 2013 in Core Thought, USA


Tags: , , ,

Milliband Senior – RIP

Faced with the anticipated tsunami of snarling bile from the usual suspects I have revisited the Milliband-and-his-father story. It is of course true that Milliband Senior and his crackpot Marxist views have no relevance whatsoever to Britain today and should never have been trawled through the press. However, it is the progeny of the man who brought him up, endlessly rabbiting on about his upbringing and inspiration from Daddy. This is like introducing certain evidence into court; you then have to accept cross-examination.

Milliband Senior no doubt wanted more fairness in British society – don’t we all (except the Labour Party of course). However, to take just one example of his general nastiness we can look at the Falklands War. If you remember, a sordid bunch of acknowledged fascists invaded peaceful islands legally habited by British people for 150 years. The Argentinian claim to the islands BTW  is utterly spurious and made even more laughable by the fact that the entire Argentinian establishment, language and most of its people came from Spain as colonialists, massacring a sufficient number of native Indians to allow them to take over the country and colonise it. (You could not make it up.)

So, a sovereign democratic country has its land invaded by fascist troops who at great sacrifice and with immense personal  and political courage (from the loathed-by-the-left Mrs Thatcher) are eventually repelled, and freedom and democracy are returned to the indigenous people. And this, apparently, Milliband Senior hated, thus putting him firmly on the side of Galtieri and his fascist scum, which is of course where you are likely to find most Marxists if they get the chance. Both fascists and Marxists like to exercise total power over “their” people on the basis that the former know best. I hate, despise, loathe and execrate all such people – including the Castro family of Cuba and all their loathsome supporters – and therefore of course Milliband Senior, however bleeding his heart may have been for the working class (whom of course Marxists invariably impoverish.)

Let us therefore confine Mr R Milliband Senior to the dustbin of history along with other dead Marxist fascists and concentrate on his sprog. Milliband Minorissimo and his somewhat posher Maxibruder were at the heart of Noo Labour through the Blair, Brown and Mandelscum era. As far as I know they were fully behind all that was done; I certainly never recall a peep of complaint or indeed an original idea from either of them. Neither had the guts to oppose the quite surreally-useless Brown in a leadership contest and – along with Balls – share a large part of the responsibility for the utter shambles they bequeathed the nation.Shambles? During Labour’s 13 horrendous years:

  • The government that was supposed to have abolished boom and bust in fact specialised principally in the second part, bankrupting the country which they handed over with vast, runaway debt, both private and public.

  • Symbolic of their treasonous behaviour was their signing over to the EU of billions MORE money AFTER the election but BEFORE the Coalition had formally taken over. Thanks for that. Blair of course had previously given up billions of Mrs Thatcher’s hard-won clawback from the loathsome, quasi-fascist EU. Thank you Blair – be careful on your new private jet – how are the kids doing in their private school?

  • Between 4 and 10 MILLION immigrants entered the country (nobody has a clue how many) in a – it seems clear, but of course they will never admit it officially – deliberate and brazen attempt to “shaft the Tories” and give Labour millions more votes, including with a horrendously fraudulent postal-voting explosion which – of course – massively favours Labour.

  • Millions of these immigrants – vast numbers of whom are illegal – are Muslims, who cluster into ghettoes, build mosques, create “Muslim areas” and of course introduce the usual barbaric Islamic customs in its grotesque treatment of women, hatred for democracy, homosexuals, Jews, normal meat (we native Brits must now have odious Halal Meat signs stuck under our noses in supermarkets and are often fed it without our knowledge, but woe betide you if a Muslim eats pork by mistake – OH GOD – GET THE ECHR IN HERE AT ONCE) other cultures and so on. The result of this is increasing ghettoisation of large areas of our cities as indigenous whites move out in horror – not a problem faced by the elitist Milliband clan in Hampstead of course. South-East London where I grew up now feels like another country.

  • “Faith schools” were greatly expanded, where the progeny of weird sects can be more easily brainwashed into their odious practices, all TOTALLY alien to our customs and traditions – and indeed to both reason and the Human Spirit.

  • The City was allowed and even encouraged to gorge on a massive excess of bonuses and generally immoral fraud and corruption. YES, IT WAS UNDER LABOUR THAT THE CITY BECAME UNSUPERVISED AND CORRUPT, despite the THREE THOUSAND employees of the FSA who were supposed to supervise it.

  • NOTHING was done to solve the horrendous housing crisis – made much worse by the arrival of millions of immigrants. Instead, Labour (the working-class party? HA, HA, HA) massively favoured “Buy-to-let”, a policy specifically designed to favour landlords and lock people forever into tenancies rather than having the chance to own their own homes as of course all Labour MPs do. Politicians rejoiced in the feel-good factor when house prices rose; their own wealth accumulating in line with that of the haves on whom they rely for votes – the have-nots could of course be appeased with ever more benefits.

  • NO PLANNING was done re power supplies, which with nuclear-powered stations running down now look very shaky indeed.

  • Heathrow was allowed to decline, no long-term decision being made to maintain its once-proud premier position in Europe.

  • ALL EU regulation and demands were fawningly acceded to so that most of our laws are now made in Brussels and not in London.

  • Law and Order was allowed to become a joke: all notions of deterrent and punishment being chucked out of the window.

  •  BILLIONS were poured into the NHS (principally into the hands of doctors) while the service constantly declined in quality to the point where it is a national disgrace. Vast increases in immigrants did not help, nor did the government’s total inability to punish the many thousands of binge-sodden drunks on the street who end up in A&E Departments.-

  • There was an explosion in welfare that the country simply cannot afford: irresponsible parents can have multiple kids willy-nilly knowing that someone else will pay for them. In one third of residences in Liverpool live families where NOBODY HAS EVER WORKED (but note the plethora of SKY TV aerials in these areas ground into the dust by evil capitalists)

  • Immigrants with large families are housed free in posh houses in London, so as to be near “their communities”; the number of “disabled” people has rocketed to be now a far bigger proportion than after the war, when hundreds of thousands of our men returned with shattered limbs – and so on and on and on.

  • The education system has been dumbed down so that many qualifications are no longer worth the paper they are written on.

  • A horrendously-expensive program of “carbon-saving” was launched (Minibruder’s particular contribution to the working class) which is turning out to be a complete hoax and vast waste of money even as India and China build one coal-fired power station PER WEEK.

In short – actually not so short, and I am sure I have left a lot out – the previous government – of which Milliband was an integral part – was stupefyingly incompetent and far worse, wilfully treacherous in its TOTALLY UNMANDATED immigration policies. No Labour manifesto EVER said “We will allow in millions of immigrants and give them immediate access to benefits”, but THAT IS WHAT THEY DID. And when poor Mrs Duffy had the temerity to mildly complain about this to the odious Brown – her town being “swamped” – she was called “a bigot”. Breathtaking. Incidentally, if ever there was a case showing that for ALL politicians should be miked up so that we could hear every word – also in private – then this was it. This incident alone revealed the lying, duplicitious, patronising attitude of the Labour Leader (adored and respected, remember, by his advisors Milliband and Balls).

You might think that nobody in their right mind would ever vote for this treasonous rabble ever again, and yet this is what is being served up. Minibrain is touting himself as the working-man’s saviour for pledging to freeze energy prices for two years – AND THE VICTIMS FALL FOR IT! Unbelievable; talk about “lambs to the slaughter” – we truly get the leaders we deserve, though I personally do not feel I deserved Blair or Brown. And WHEN this odious, loathsome, scurrilous, patronising and treasonous bunch of morons handed over to the Coalition, IMMEDIATELY started a tsunami of accusations about their evil treatment of the plebs, with accusations about evil, Tory “cuts”.

Actually, BRITAIN’S DEBT HAS CONTINUED TO RISE. There has BEEN no “cut” in expenditure – quite the contrary. In fact, the Coalition has been almost as profligate as the previous bunch of duplicitous incompetents. “Expand the economy”? HA HA – if it was so easy, WHY DID YOU NOT DO IT? “End to austerity”? You can just imagine my parents after the war complaining about wanting an “end to austerity”. The ONLY way to end austerity is to WORK YOUR GUTS OUT TO EARN IT.

The Labour Party’s thoroughly NASTY attacks on the Coalition about “cuts” are as duplicitious and cynical as the rest of their approach to politics. Nothing illustrates this more than their U-turn re immigration and “racism” A month ago anyone calling for an end to insane immigration was a “racist”. Suddenly, calling for a halt is official Labour policy, so all we previous racists an now unracist ourselves. YOU COULD NOT MAKE IT UP.

In conclusion,. there is practically NOTHING the DM could say of a negative nature that would in fact adequately describe the appalling incompetence, cynicism and awfulness of the Labour Party as it now exists. When we have a new generation of leaders untainted by the sheer gutless gruesomeness of Milliband, Balls, Harman et al, then perhaps old-fashioned “socialists” and champions of the working-class could consider voting for them again. Until then, only a moron would vote Labour, but there are indeed plenty of those about, with the moronic mantra: “Whatever Labour does, the Tories are worse.”

Please can we have some leaders we deserve and need.

Leave a comment

Posted by on October 6, 2013 in Britain, Politics


Tags: ,

The BBC & Lord Haw-Haw

The BBC is now basically worse than Lord Haw-Haw:

A) We didn’t have to pay Lord Haw-Haw for biased reporting and running down the country.

B) He at least did not pretend to be something he wasn’t.

C) Nobody took him seriously: he was a sick and failing joke, in which of course he and the BBC are similar.

The coverage of Milliband and his Marxist, Britiish-institution and way-of-life hating father has been absurdly out of proportion to its importance, fed by the BBC leftist mindset like vultures round a dead cow. The BBC is an appallingly outdated and pernicious influence in public life, no longer serving “the public” but the leftist policies and mantras of the heirs of Marxism.

“Peter Sissons, who presented the BBC Nine O’Clock News and BBC News at Ten between 1993 and 2003, said: ‘The real difficulty is that the overwhelming view of the BBC’s news executives is broadly sympathetic towards the Labour Party and is inclined to always give Labour the benefit of the doubt. There is a political imbalance within the BBC which in this case has led to a basic failure of journalism.’“

Right on the nail, Peter.

1 Comment

Posted by on October 6, 2013 in Britain


Tags: , , ,

Where Does the Carbon Dioxide Really Come From?

Ian Rutherford Plimer is an Australian geologist, Professor Emeritus of Earth Sciences at the University of Melbourne, Professor of Mining Geology at the University of Adelaide, and the director of multiple mineral exploration and mining companies. He has published 130 scientific papers, six books and edited the Encyclopedia of Geology. Professor Ian Plimer could not have said it better!

If you’ve read his book you will agree, this is a good summary.

PLIMER: “Okay, here’s the bombshell. The volcanic eruption in Iceland . Since its first spewing of volcanic ash has, in just FOUR DAYS, NEGATED EVERY SINGLE EFFORT you have made in the past five years to control CO2 emissions on our planet – all of you.

Of course, you know about this evil carbon dioxide that we are trying to suppress – it’s that vital chemical compound that every plant requires to live and grow and to synthesize into oxygen for us humans and all animal life.

I know….it’s very disheartening to realize that all of the carbon emission savings you have accomplished while suffering the inconvenience and expense of driving Prius hybrids, buying fabric grocery bags, sitting up till midnight to finish your kids “The Green Revolution” science project, throwing out all of your non-green cleaning supplies, using only two squares of toilet paper, putting a brick in your toilet tank reservoir, selling your SUV and speedboat, vacationing at home instead of abroad. Nearly getting hit every day on your bicycle, replacing all of your 50 cent light bulbs with $10.00 light bulbs…..well, all of those things you have done have all gone down the tubes in just four days.

The volcanic ash emitted into the Earth’s atmosphere in just four days – yes, FOUR DAYS – by that volcano in Iceland has totally erased every single effort you have made to reduce the evil beast, carbon. And there are around 200 active volcanoes on the planet spewing out this crud at any one time – EVERY DAY.

I don’t really want to rain on your parade too much, but I should mention that when the volcano Mt Pinatubo erupted in the Philippines in 1991, it spewed out more greenhouse gases into the atmosphere than the entire human race had emitted in all its years on earth.

Yes, folks, Mt Pinatubo was active for over one year – think about it.

Of course, I shouldn’t spoil this ‘touchy-feely tree-hugging’ moment and mention the effect of solar and cosmic activity and the well-recognized 800-year global heating and cooling cycle, which keeps happening despite our completely insignificant efforts to affect climate change.

And I do wish I had a silver lining to this volcanic ash cloud, but the fact of the matter is that the bush fire season across the western USA and Australia this year alone will negate your efforts to reduce carbon in our world for the next two to three years. And it happens every year.

Just remember that your government just tried to impose a whopping carbon tax on you, on the basis of the bogus ‘human-caused’ climate-change scenario.

Hey, isn’t it interesting how they don’t mention ‘Global Warming’ anymore, but just ‘Climate Change’ – you know why? It’s because the planet has COOLED by 0.7 degrees in the past century and these global warming bullshit artists got caught with their pants down.

And, just keep in mind that you might yet have an Emissions Trading Scheme – that whopping new tax – imposed on you that will achieve absolutely nothing except make you poorer. It won’t stop any volcanoes from erupting, that’s for sure.

But, hey, relax…… and have a nice day!”


Posted by on October 5, 2013 in Core Thought, Human Interest, Politics


Tags: , , ,